Pages

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Why Should US Citizens Feel Less Secure?


Imagine a glass cage, inside it; you see two muscled law officers, a man and a woman, each of them carrying on their body and belt guns, hardware, instruments of repression, and telecommunications equipment that will make any law enforcement person envious. The woman officer is body searching a 3-years old girl. She is asking the child to standstill, raise your hands, and face the luggage that is pouring out of the bully of the x-ray machine in this security checkpoint at National Airport, in Washington DC.
US citizens should really feel safe and secure because our government has invested, over the past 6 years, millions of dollars of our tax-money, to build the so-called the "Transportation Safety Administration" (TSA) with lucrative investments in training, equipment, communications, devices, and personnel to be used to body search 3-years old children.
This is a true story, it happened on Sunday December 21, 2008, in Washington's Reagan National Airport, at 11:30 am. The 3-years old child is my beloved granddaughter, Sama Jahmila May AlBanna-Levy. This child is an American born citizen, of American born parents. She has lived all her long 3-years on earth in Takoma Park, MD, played in local playgrounds, with local children, and attended a local day care.


In fact the true story is even worse, the whole family of four adults, two are above sixty years old, my wife Linah and I, are naturalized US citizens, and two young people, my daughter, Badia (34 years old), the mother of Sama, and my son, Badr (26 years old), both young people are born American citizens. We were travelling to the US Virgin Island, to take a long awaited family vacation. In fact, we were all subject to this 'thorough' body search and detailed searching of our luggage.
The ordeal started on Saturday December 20, 2008 with us rushing at 5:00 am to Dallas Airport to catch the US-Airways flight to USVI. We were more than 2 hours early we checked-in, passed security checks, and arrived at the gate long-enough to have breakfast while waiting to board. Our flight was cancel due to equipment failure. We then waited for 9 hours more for US Airways to re-route the five of us. They could only find seats on Delta Airlines flights originating in National Airport, laying over at Atlanta, GA and connecting to Delta flight heading to St. Thomas, USVI. We had to return home Saturday after about 15 hours ordeal and wait till Sunday morning to return to National Airport.
At the Delta Airlines check-in counter, the family survived the long waiting lines and the luggage scanning process, our spirits lifted as the prospects of actually having a vacation increased. We proceeded to the security TSA checkpoint before entering the departure gate area. The TSA officer informed the members of the family, one by one, that TSA selected us for the "special security check", to which a "random sub set of passengers" are subjected to, which involves a more detailed body search and carry-on luggage check than what other passengers have to endure. We asked on what basis where we selected; the officer explained that our boarding passes had the "S" marking printed on it. The implication is that the Delta Airlines passenger processing system had selected us, supposedly randomly, and marked our boarding passes with the notorious "S".
Well, let us analyze this a bit further. The Delta Airlines system has an algorithm that decides who gets the 'royal' treatment and prints and "S" on their boarding passes. The TSA must have added this algorithm must, or at least the algorithm, the TSA approved it, since they accept its designations. On what basis does this algorithm work? I imagine that it will have a number of business rules and designation lists that it uses to reach the conclusion this passenger is "S", clear, cannot board, etc. Either the lists could be a list of specific names, particularly last names, or certain syntax that allows the business rules to decide that such and such passenger deserves an "S". In our case, the algorithm seems to have selected us based on our last name, AlBanna, which is the only common thing to all five of us. Neither age, nor affiliation, nor previous activities, nor birthplace, nor citizenship, nor profession can be a common feature to select for all five of us. The algorithm does not seem to distinguish between a 3-years old girl from a 63 years old man.
AlBanna is an Arab name. Never mind the protection of the US Constitution or Citizenship in good standing. If a person is an Arab, or of an Arab descent, then one is a suspect by virtue of his/hers birth. This is racial profiling.
Does Congress care when it allocates our tax money for these purposes?
Does Congress ask questions about results or process, or rules, or performance?
Does any elected official really care, how in the name of the security of the people of United States, basic human rights are being trampled on?
I will not ask the Bush government about this infraction of civil liberties. One only has to compare this incident to the now well known record of 'accomplishments' in torture, abridgement of the writ of habeas corpus, rendition, Abu Gherab, Guantanamo, illegal wire-tapping, illegal invasion of Iraq, and, God, the list of infractions against our own Constitution is too long, horrific, and shameful.
The people of the United State will need to review, reflect, understand, and explain, over the next century, what this whole experience means for our democracy, for the future of the republic, for its impact on the image and the moral standing of the US in the world.


Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Arabic Poem By Munther Arsheed: "let Me Kiss Your Shoes … O Son of the Two Rivers”

دعني أقبلْ حذاءَكَ ....يا أبنَ الرفديَن

بقلم : منذر ارشيد

فلا أشْهى مِن قبُلةٍ على ذاكَ الجَبينْ

قبلةً تُحييِني لكرامةٍ ماتتْ عبرَ السنين

فَحِذائكَ اليومَ أشهى مِنْ عروس ٍ

لعريس ٍ في ليلةِ دخلةِ ذاكَ الهَجينْ

يا قاذفَ الحذاءِ صاروخاً حذائك أمرٌ يقين ..!!

لا بل حذا ئيك يا أخي يا إبنَ العراقِ الأمين

فقد أعطيتنا بحذائِك اليوم َكنزٌ ثمين

وأعدتَ توازُن َالرعبِ فأحذيتنا ما عادت

إلا قذائفَ في وجه الظالمين

بوش... يكفي أنه إنحنى أمام نعلٍ عراقي حزين

وطأطأ رأسَه ُخوفا ً مِنْ مَداسِك المِسكينْ

فحذائك اليومَ كأنَهُ صاروخاً ولم يكلف ملايين

ببضعِ دنانيرَ حقق إعجازاً بقهره ذاك اللعين

لم يعبر المحيطات .! بل بخطوةٍ حققَ الهدفَ الأمين

قناصُ بغدادَ لم تُخطيء" فحذائكَ أصابَ رأسَ العفينْ

صرخ الحذاءُ وقال.... أهنتني يا صاحبي

فابتعدت عن بوش هذا

حتى لا يلوثني وجه خنزيرٍ لعين

خسئت يا فرعون فزمانك ولى وعهد الظالمين

فحذائي سيكون عبرة كما أغرق اليم

أخاك المحنط حتى يحين

موعد الفجر الآتي لتحرير العراق وفلسطين

قال الحذاءُ .......

لا اهلا ولا سهلا بك يا قاتلً العراقييين

يا منتظرُ الزيديُ إسمُك اليومَ أسمٌ متين

ظللت َ منتظراً وأطلقتَ ثأرك يا ابن الرافدين

وأكد ت أن في العراق شعب لا يستكين

قالت َ للمالكي... خَسئِتَ بحبك لخنزيرٍ عفين

فحذائي سيقلبُ أحلامكَ فلا مكانَ للخائنين

من جلبوا الطغاةَ جيش الأعادي الماكرين

سترحلُ حتماً وتعودُ العراقُ كريمةً يا مُجرمينْ

رغمَ أنفِ أمريكا وجيش القاتلين

عراقُ العربِ هنيئاً وأخلعوا نعالكم وسيروا حافيين

وألقو بها على جنود بوش ضرباً باليمين

وكل التحايا والمحبة منا نحن الفلسطينيين

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Edward Said: A Personal Memory



On December 5, 2008, Bus Boys and Poet's Restaurant in Washington DC unveiled in a community ceremony a picture of the late Palestinian-American intellectual, writer, and thought-leader Professor Edward Said. I was among those asked to remember this great man and close friend. Following is my talk.
Sami AlBanna
December 5, 2008
----------------------------
I salute my friends Grace, Anis, and the US Campaign for this effort to raise, only five miles away from the White House, the picture of my late friend, colleague, and brother Edward Said. The Arab and Progressive communities in Washington DC need to remember Edward for his many contributions to the struggle for truth, justice, and liberation. I thank you for inviting me to remember this outstanding public intellectual and allow me, for the first time, an opportunity to celebrate his life and mourn his death. I have been living in denial of his death and still find it difficult to accept that he is no longer with us.
The symbolism of raising the picture of Edward as the people of the United States are removing the pictures of George W. Bush in the White House and across our nation is important. Edward lived and died as a committed public intellectual and a towering thinker to abstract, explain, and act on matters of injustice and inequality to enable us to have more strength to continue the battle for peace and justice.
The American progressive movement cherishes a strong American Revolutionary principle of "speaking truth to power". Edward, as symbol of my generation and a testimony to its contributions to the struggle, made a truly outstanding contribution of a new expanded principle of progressive struggle: "Speak truth with integrity to all people … powerful or powerless".
I was blessed with about 40 years of friendship with Edward. I was his best man we he married Mariam. I was part of the mourners that laid his ashes to rest in Lebanon. We spent long hours discussing and fighting. We met with many powerful people, students, refuges, political activities, community organizers, celebrities, and diplomats. I was present when Edward gave speeches in public, private, small groups, and a group of very few. Edward spoke the truth with integrity, clarity, and vehemence.
At Columbia University, early in our friendship in the years after June 1967, Edward and I used to spend many multi-hour sessions every week discussing, arguing and differing about topics ranging from politics, strategy, ideology, analysis, and gossip, to issues of transformation and change. Few friends used to join us in this on-going marathon of ideas, critique, and exploration. Among those that attended, some of these sessions were my ex-room mate Boyd Black, now Distinguished Professor of Labor Economics in Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Of course, at the time Boyd and I were flaming radical-left revolutionaries. We discussed with heat, commitment, and urgency visions of a world that will soon be reborn.
I remember one day Boyd and I read a long analysis article based on Marx's Book, "The German Ideology". That became a subject to one of the discussion sessions with Edward. Boyd and I were sure of our understanding, perceptions and convictions. Edward was arguing against us. As the tempo, pitch, and heat of the discussion kept rising to higher and higher levels, Edward interrupted by asking a simple question: "Have you guys read the 'German Ideology'?" We did not then.
Edward retorted with a classical position, "I do not mind whether you are revolutionaries or not, you have to read the original sources, particularly the classics, before you can embark on developing a reasonable foundation for new analysis and new positions." I have cherished this advice. I share this advice with love with all those that want to take the responsibility of leadership and change seriously. We have to be serious about our thought and our sources to be able to lead a movement of change.
Fast forward 25 years to early 1990s, Edward and Mariam returned from an invitation to visit South Africa after the collapse Apartheid. The same period is when Edward discovered that he had cancer. I went to NY to have dinner with them. Mariam was understandably upset about the news. Edward, in his true self, described with precision the Doctors findings and declared that he will continue to fight it. Indeed his battle with cancer was a lesson to all of us in the love life and in dying with dignity. The conversation moved to the topic of the trip to South Africa.
Edward reported that they met many political, academic, intellectual, and community leaders. He gave a number of lectures and held many discussion sessions. He explained, "I kept asking people I met: how did you do it? Why is it that South Africa's struggle could succeed and the Palestine struggle has not yet triumphed?"
Finally, in a closed meeting with the Chairperson of the African National Congress (ANC), Edward got an answer, which remains true to all struggles today.
The ANC Chairperson explained: "The reason for the success of our struggle is 'moral ascendency'. We struggled to establish the 'moral ascendency' of our cause and the 'moral bankruptcy' of the Apartheid regime. We leveraged our 'moral ascendency' to lay an international siege to the Apartheid regime until it collapsed."
Edward asked, "What about people mobilization? What about armed struggle? What about strikes and protests?"
The ANC leader explained, "Yes, these are all important but only to the degree that they demonstrate the will of our people, the justice of our cause, and the 'moral ascendency' of our struggle."
Today, as we cross into the era of the "Obama change", I miss Edward even more. His insights, wisdom, and clarity of vision would have helped us steer the change in a positive direction and away from the ever-escalating disaster in the Middle East.